A force for change
The NGO movement has grown over the years in organisation and influence. Some in the government now see it as a threat

After setting up the first NGO in Thailand in 1969, Dr Puey Ungphakorn, former rector of Thammasat University, set up the Graduate Volunteer Centre a year later. Similar programmes followed at other universities, such as the Khon Kaen University and the Thai Volunteer Service which Mr Phumtham Vejjayachai, a close aide to the Prime Minister, used to work for.

Prior to volunteer NGOs, various social welfare works were established by several Thai charity groups, mostly to provide immediate relief for flooding, famine, and poverty.

During the civil wars in neighbouring countries, international NGOs and funding agencies came to Thailand to help refugees.

Then, international organisations saw the need to also help destitute Thai farmers, slum dwellers, and marginalised groups.

After three decades of economic and social development by the government, the country was suffering from corrupt and mismanaged government policies. Villagers found no ways to air their grievances.

In 1985, NGOs set up a joint committee of public agencies as proposed by the Minister of the Interior. This resulted in the NGO Coordinating Committee, a national organisation for all types of NGOs, but mostly concerned with development work. NGOs worked closely with civic organisations in various sectors of society.

In 1995, a number of organisations and civic groups which were affected by many state projects organised themselves into the Forum of the Poor, which later became the Assembly of the Poor. Their goal was to have more negotiating power with the government. The Assembly of the Poor is not an NGO.

The Assembly of the Poor has been pressuring the government to solve problems involving land rights, citizenship, and dam construction, to name a few.

The proliferation of these networks of NGOs and civic organisations may be indicative of weakness in the Thai political system. For instance, Members of Parliament rarely speak for the disadvantaged.

Officials maintain that there is something sinister in the uniting of protesters of the gas pipeline project with the protesters of the Pak Moon dam or some other protesters.

But villagers and civil groups say this is simply a function of national networking.

Sompong Viengchan, a Pak Moon village leader, said that the problems of villagers are interrelated. They have to help each other.

A problem in faraway Chana can be a national problem too. So, it is also our problem.

We understand the problems of the gas pipeline project. It involves national benefits and the livelihood of our countrymen.

We see the police mobilise forces from different sources to help crack down on the poor. We poor people have to help each other. We have little support and little means, but we try our best to help each other.''

The network of NGOs and civic groups are considered to be irritants by the government.

The Thai-Malaysia gas pipeline protesters want answers to their questions, hence their river of petition letters. But the government says the villagers are asking nothing new.

Banchong Nasae, an NGO worker who works with small-scale fishermen affected by the pipeline, says the government has not answered any of the old questions. How can we come up with new ones?''

SUPARA JANCHITFAH
BANGKOK POST - Perspective
5 January 2003